Hat’s off to the DNT

After 30 years in Alaska, in 2005 Kathy and I decided to re-locate to the “lower 48.”  We had a set of criteria for evaluating our choice that included, a strong university influence, clean air, abundant fresh water, some wilderness close by, a vibrant arts scene and a good community newspaper.

We looked the Oregon coast and Southwest over very closely and neither of us had much interest in the Twin Cities again even though Minneapolis was my home town.  We didn’t have all that much trouble finally deciding to move 1500 miles south in order to be “up north” in Duluth.

Just after settling in, we both thought the Duluth News Tribune was really a good paper for the size of the community.   But for awhile shortly thereafter, it seemed to slip substantially which was disappointing and irritating.

However, for what it’s worth, the paper seems to have rallied and is right up there again in my opinion.  Glad you’re back!

Internet Gun Sales

I can’t believe how many times I’ve read in print news media or heard on TV news programs or on the radio that expanded background checks are necessary to prevent  “internet gun sales” as though a person could buy a gun (that takes regular bullets) from some web site and have it shipped directly to himself.  Out in the open, that kind of transaction is nonexistent.  Let me repeat.  No one can legally do that today in the USA and no one ever could.

Yes, armed robberies are illegal yet there are some.  Burglaries are illegal yet they occur also.  I suppose there may be some “brown bag” gun sales from web sites where guns may be surreptitiously smuggled thru the mail directly to the end customer thereby avoiding a background check, but expanding the background check system will have a zero effect on this criminal activity.

It is bewildering how this myth ever got started about internet gun sales but I hope to never again have this fairy tale presented to me in newspapers or magazines or on the radio or TV.

Playing With Fire While Ignoring The Real Problems

Many in America seem to have a general disregard for law and order.  Most disturbing, however, is when our highest level public servants disregard fundamental provisions of the most important document ever written, our Constitution, (which they all swore to protect, preserve and defend prior to actually being installed in their jobs).

Too frequently it seems, the higher up the political or military ladder some are, the greater is their tendency to believe that the principles, ideas and legislative intent of provisions in our constitution don’t pertain to them.  They design cockamamie and elaborate explanations to convince the rest of us that their disregard is justified and for the good of the country.

Many of us know that cardinal provisions of the 1st, 4th, 5th, 6th and 14th amendments have been dishonored and damaged by our leaders in the last 60 years, thereby unnecessarily and recklessly diminishing our country.

Almost all the “gun control” measures being proposed will start the dismantling of the 2nd amendment which I believe amounts to playing with fire.  If the 2nd amendment falls, I fear America might be done.  These proposed gun control measures will do nothing to ameliorate the real problems that are undeniably tied to and ignite violence in the country.

Specifically, the main problem resulting in despair and a sense of desperation prompting almost all the violence is debt.  Wide spread personal debt, most cities and states on the verge of bankruptcy along with our national debt of over 16 trillion dollars causes poverty, inadequate distribution of physical health care, meager mental health treatment opportunities, foreclosures, high unemployment, ballooning prison populations, anxiety and frustration giving rise to anger which manifests itself in violence.  And what is it that is causing this crushing debt destroying all aspects of our society?

Some of us know the answer to that as well.  There is only one fundamental cause and that is the unconstitutional Federal Reserve banking system, which by utilizing the three main frauds of fractional reserve lending, compound interest and the government debt bonding process results in the relentless transferring of virtually all wealth from the entrapped 99% at the bottom into the pockets of the less than 1% at the economic top of our society.  This leaves too many of us, along with government at all levels, broke.  Consequently, individually we are hampered in achieving our potential and government is rendered unable to perform necessary functions.

The term “shall not be infringed” in the second amendment means exactly that and simply cannot be fooled with frivolously or in some heat of passion fired by the recent abhorrent mass shootings which are very rare.  The literal interpretation along with the legislative intent of individual aspects of our constitution are not obscure and this most important document was designed to be difficult to modify.  If changed at all, changes can only occur in concert with the procedures prescribed in the constitution itself in Article V.

Most citizens either lost the knowledge or never knew that neither statutes, regulations nor executive orders purporting to substantially change basic notions, protections and rights in our constitution are invalid on their face.

Among other things, winning our revolutionary war resulted in the “Bill of Rights” specifically enacted and incorporated into our constitution to protect the citizens who own this country from government, not the other way around.

Finally, I know something of the frauds of our banking system along with alternatives which would force no one or any government jurisdiction into inescapable crushing debt as is now the case.  Only congress has the power to do the right thing and rescind the Federal Reserve Act of 1913 thereby starting the process of bringing our banking system in the USA back into compliance with our constitution.

In the past, I have offered to meet with any of our legislative contingent any time they are in Duluth to help get them up to speed on the mechanics and mathematically unavoidable outcomes of the enslaving frauds of our banking system and discuss some debt free and inflation free financing alternatives.  Our constitution mandates that congress alone shall “coin” our money, regulate its value and provide for the punishment of counterfeiting the securities and current coin of the United States and counterfeiting is precisely what our banking system is doing. My offer is still on the table and now expanded to include discussions about gun control and the 2nd amendment before our leaders do something ill-advised that could harm our country.

I encourage anyone to comment on, forward, copy or employ any portions of this post you find useful.

“Fiscal Cliff? – “Frying Pan or the Fire?”

“Fiscal Cliff” is a term that is mentioned with anxiety, maybe even with fear, by every news medium lately and many times every day.  For those not quite sure what “Fiscal Cliff” refers to, here’s a brief explanation of the two facets of this, so called, looming problem.

Because of laws already in place, we are told there are two alternatives.  Come January 1st, (A) the Bush tax cuts will end and everyone’s taxes are going to go up substantially.  Additionally, there will be massive cuts in government spending in all areas except possibly Social Security and Medicaid.

Alternative (B) is that no agreement is reached to modify any of the provisions of (A), the debt ceiling will need to be raised and the United States will borrow more money and increase our $16 trillion national debt in order to keep the government running.

If Congress and the President do nothing because they can’t come to some agreement close to January 1, 2013, America will be strapped with a dilemma, the customary explanation of which is: there are only two alternatives to choose from and both lead to undesirable consequences.  Think of it as the “frying pan or the fire.”  It doesn’t make much difference; you’re going to burn up with either choice you make.

Our Congressional members, award winning economists, industry CEO’s, and the well-groomed, silver-tongued talking heads on financial news programs all agree on the same two choices.  America must pick either: (A) or (B).  Since they are our “leaders” and the filters through which we are fed our information about these kinds of things, why would anyone question their seemingly scholarly conclusions?  Einstein tells us that imagination is more important than knowledge and his enlightenment about this is indispensable here.

The reason to question these people’s conclusions is because there is a third alternative.  Just turn the stove off!

The single overriding cause of our country’s debt and all the rest of our economic problems is our banking system itself.  It is structured to cause increasing debt both for our country, for our states, our municipalities and for us as individuals, and our current banking system is contradictory to the U.S. Constitution.  At Article I, Section 8, Clause 5, which has never been amended, Congress is mandated to create our money and regulate its value.  Congress has this duty, which cannot be assigned to the private corporation known as the Federal Reserve Bank (the Fed)!  And Congress has the legislative power to rescind the Federal Reserve Act of 1913 wherein Congress, almost a hundred years ago during a Christmas recess, purportedly transfered its duty to create our money to private banks. That has resulted in the grandest country-wide theft of all time and it continues..

When you allow a private corporation to create a nation’s money supply, it utilizes several well-camouflaged schemes to transfer the wealth of everyone below the very top into its own pockets.  The most egregious of these schemes or ruses include (1) compound interest, despised by virtually every major religion I know of, (2) fractional reserve lending, and the “grand daddy,” of them all, (3) our national debt bonding process wherein the Fed counterfeits the money they use to buy our nation’s bonds.  These bonds are debts that have been created on behalf of us citizens and we are responsible to pay these debts off even though we had no voice in choosing to incur these debts.

So, like turning the stove off, let’s just “turn the Fed off’!”  This third alternative includes eliminating the Fed (as we know it) and compelling Congress to create our money debt free, as our “founding fathers” envisioned when they mandated Congress’s Constitutional duties.  Then spend this money directly into the economy for the things governments are supposed to spend money on in order to promote the safety, well-being and opportunities so that all citizens can pursue their happiness to the best of their abilities.

I have become weary of the relentless campaign by the bankers to brainwash five generations now since 1913 into believing that not only is there only one possible banking system but that the one we are currently enslaved by legitimately evolved out of the natural order of things.

It is time that we demand that Congress rise to meet its duty by abolishing the Fed, then create the nation’s money supply and regulate its value.  Furthermore, there are no national strategic reasons nor are there any benefits to the citizens who own this country outright, ultimately as a result of winning our Revolutionary War, for the reprehensible practices of banks charging compound interest and engaging in fractional reserve lending.  These practices must be outlawed once and for all and immediately!

As I see it, there are only two possible reasons why congressional members will fail to stand united for these changes to our monetary system.  It is either out of ignorance or corruption, neither of which would seem to qualify anyone for Congress.

I’d be happy to discuss any of this with anyone in Congress, anytime, publicly or in private, if they have the courage.  Any takers?

Ken Kollodge

Duluth, Minnesota

 

 

Obamacare will bankrupt America?

The idea that Obamacare (Universal Health Care) will bankrupt the United States has been trumpeted recklessly, disingenuously or without a sufficient understanding of the issues by a tragically large portion of Americans.  This idea is absolute nonsense for at least two reasons.  The first reason is related to too many of us losing our moral compass and the second is related to a brainwashing of our citizens.

Our wars in Korea, Vietnam, two times in Iraq and in Afghanistan clearly indicate we have lost our moral compass.  All were elective wars, none ever included physical attacks on American soil by a foreign military unit and none were “declared” as is required by our Constitution.

Our Constitution at Article 1, Section 8, clause 11 states that Congress “shall” have power “To declare War,….”  It does not read “may” have power “To declare War,…”  We haven’t had a Constitutionally authorized war since World War II in the 1940′s.  But we have allowed tens of thousands of our best to die fighting on foreign soil since then and ten times that many of our own wounded.  We have killed many hundreds of thousands of citizens in those other countries and squandered trillions of dollars, much of which was borrowed money.  Yet we can’t afford Obamacare for our own citizens?  Who are the fools that are saying this or believe it?

This squandered money did nothing but fuel an increasingly lavish party for the military/industrial complex, the development of which President Eisenhower warned us about in 1960, as he left office after having served eight years.  We need to re-calibrate our moral compass, face up to the magnitude of our worldwide unjustifiable military aggression, pray to be forgiven for it, and redirect most of that military spending to benefiting our own citizens, including funding Obamacare.

The brainwashing of us all is the second reason for the proliferation of the idea that Obamacare will bankrupt America.  Please see “The Rule Book: Part 2″ posted October 21, 2012, on this blog for a little stage-setting background.

Specifically, for the past several generations in America, there has been an escalating effort on the part of the bankers to seduce Americans to be comfortable in accepting that our Federal Reserve banking system is the only banking system possible and that it is the natural way of things. This would include accepting it’s enslaving outcome, that results from nothing more than a well-camouflaged set of schemes to transfer whatever wealth most of us at the bottom have, into the pockets of the few at the top.

We do not need to borrow money at interest to operate our government: a practice that has resulted in a $16 trillion national debt.  We have, as a country through the Constitutional mandate to Congress, the absolute authority to create our own money and spend it directly into the economy without borrowing a nickel.

Obamacare will bankrupt America?  No, not even close!  The Federal Reserve Bank itself has almost bankrupted America already.  The sooner we dissolve the Federal Reserve Bank, the better.

Ken Kollodge

 

 

 

Mitt – Champ or Chump?

Mitt Romney, the chosen Republican presidential candidate for 2012, has said many times in the last several weeks things that I would like to re-familiarize all of us with.

He’s said that there are 23 million (23,000,000) Americans “out-of-work” that would take a job if one was offered.  He has also said that he has a “plan” to create 12 million (12,000,000) new jobs (I hope here in America, not in China) in his first 4 years if elected president.  For the moment I’m wiling to take him at his word.  Wouldn’t it be just grand if he could create those 12 million new jobs in his first 4 years as president?  Even though we have never been provided with details about this 12 million new jobs plan of Romney’s, for now, let’s just presume he has a fool proof idea how to “Get’ er Done.”

Obama, on the other hand, has not boasted that he has a plan, real or even fictitious, to create that many new jobs in the next 4 years if re-elected.  Let’s analyze this situation.

Mitt Romney was sent to the best schools and got his law degree.  He became a business tycoon and ended up as a state governor and a multimillionaire.  Now, how could someone like this who has been running for the presidency of the United States for six years, right near the end of the campaign, pass up a once-in-a lifetime and delicious opportunity to crush his opponent, Barack Obama?  How could Romney resist, or fail to recognize the opportunity to make a fool of Obama and deliver the knockout punch?   Does Romney have a penchant for self destruction or just not sufficient acumen for self actualization?

Here’s what I’m getting at.  Point one, presuming that Romney is right that there are 23 million Americans who would take a job if one was available and presuming that Romney does, in fact, have a plan to create 12 million new jobs in his first four years as president, why would he be punishing his fellow out-of-work citizens by not disclosing the details of his plan right now?  So what if Obama even steals his plan late in the game and implements it to accelerate job growth which we so desperately need?  It will still go down as Romney’s great plan that saved the country.  If he really loves his country, the patriotic thing to do is for Romney to tell us about this plan now rather than waiting for even the next few days or worse yet, until after he might be sworn in on January 20th.  What is the excuse for holding back?  Is there some moral lesson I haven’t yet learned that could justify his not disclosing details about his 12 million job creation plan right now?  What am I missing?

My second, yet related point about our unemployment catastrophe has to do with the corporate cash “sitting on the sidelines.”  I’ve heard estimates that somewhere between 2 and 3 trillion dollars in cash are held by our big American corporations, cash not being used for anything they care to disclose, particularly not new job creation.

There’s a big difference between 2 and 3 trillion of anything but I’ve not heard even one ultra conservative pundit cast doubt on the figure of 2 trillion dollars in cash held by our big corporations. So, I’m willing to go with the low end of the estimate – 2 trillion dollars.

Ok, here’s is a math problem that any of our better American 8th grade students should be able to solve easily and reliably.  Let the calculation begin.

If just 1 trillion of those corporate dollars sitting on the sidelines was put to good use, that is, half of the corporate war-chest of $2 trillion, that still leaves those big corporations with $1 trillion to have fun with.  What would be a one-year average wage of all 23 million workers Romney says are out of work that would take a job if available if we just divided that 23 million workers into half of the cash our American corporations have sitting on the sidelines?

Well, 23 million divided into $1 trillion comes out to an annual salary of $43,478.26 for each of those 23 million workers!  How many of you out there are making $43 thousand per year?  How many of you out there that are making less than $43 thousand per year are planning to vote for Romney?  How many of you out there that are making less than $43,000 per year think that if you put up enough yard signs and attach enough bumper stickers for the Romney/Ryan ticket, then vote for them, they, if they win, will send you a personal invitation to sit and dine with them at the head table?  How many of you understand that Romney is one of those in that corporate group that is sitting on that $2 trillion?  How many of you think that Romney gives a hoot about you?  Do you think you have anything in common with him or that he’s like you in any way whatsoever?

I am baffled.  How did a self destructive mass delusion so successfully overwhelm the good sense of almost half our voters such that a soulless individual like Mitt Romney was ever considered acceptable enough to be placed on the ticket for the presidency of my United States?

Ken Kollodge

The Rule Book: Part 2

After the football analogy in my last post, “The Rule Book,” I touched on the pledge our newly elected U.S. Senator and House member will be making in a group with others newly elected to Washington D.C.  Essentially, they will promise to be faithful to, support and defend the U. S. Constitution.   I am now asking them to make a specific pledge prior to the election to rid our nation of a plague, the existence of which is contradictory to our Constitution.

So, what is this plague, this pestilence that is ruining the country – a plague Congress has the constitutional authority to eliminate?  It is our central bank, the Federal Reserve Bank (the Fed).  The very existence of the Fed is contradictory to Article I, Section 8, clause 5 in our Constitution.  This clause clearly mandates that Congress shall have power to “coin (our) money, (and) regulate the value thereof….”

Actually, I’m in revered company in concluding that there is no need for the Fed.  Benjamin Franklin, presidents Thomas Jefferson, James Madison, Andrew Jackson, Abraham Lincoln, Teddy Roosevelt and other luminaries like Henry Ford, Thomas Edison and ten-year U.S. House member from Minnesota, Charles Lindbergh Sr., all embraced that same conclusion.  None of these American giants were intellectual lightweights.

The Fed is a secret cartel of large private banks that is unrelated to our federal government.  Because of the Fed and our several previous similar central type banks, the United States has accumulated a national debt of over 16 trillion dollars, way more than we can ever pay back regardless of the myriad cockamamie schemes advanced by our current politicians and TV pundits.

A news story on page A2 of the Duluth News Tribune on October 13, 2012, reported about our country’s budget gaps since 1990.  The gap “between the government’s tax revenue and it’s spending – totaled $1.1 trillion” just in 2012.  The article goes on to say, “Put simply, that’s how much the government had to borrow” (in other words the amount the national debt increased in 2012 alone). You see, the $1.1 trillion “borrowed” for 2012 is a debt that you and I are expected to pay back eventually and this debt accumulates interest besides. That little phrase in the news article “had to borrow” jumped right out and slapped me in the face!  By no means did the government HAVE to borrow a single penny.

According to our Constitution, Congress exclusively has the authority to print and regulate the value of our money.  However, the Federal Reserve Act of 1913 purportedly transferred that authority to the Fed.  So here is a bare bones explanation about how this “borrowing” from the Fed basically works.

If the  amount of money that, by law, must be spent in a given year is not covered by what was collected in taxes, The Treasury prints and delivers to the Fed an equal amount in government bonds which the Fed is to “buy” from the Treasury and later sell to the public.  So, where does the Fed get this money to “buy” these bonds?

Because of the Federal Reserve Act of 1913, the Fed tells Treasury to print that money (the Federal Reserve Notes like the money you have in your pocket) in the amount equivalent to the bonds the Fed just received from Treasury.  The newly printed money is delivered to the Fed who gives it back to Treasury as “payment” for the bonds.  Treasury then deposits this returned money in commercial banks and starts writing checks on it for government expenditures.  If this appears to you to be a fraud, a cheap carnival shell game, well, you’re right, it is.  This slight-of-hand maneuver caused you and I to acquire another $1.1 trillion in new debt and the amount continues to grow because of the accumulating interest.  That interest is paid out of the federal taxes you pay. So essentially the money coming out of your pocket that you pay in taxes goes directly into the pockets of those rich enough to buy the bonds in the first place and we, as citizens, get no benefit whatsoever for these interest payments we end up making.  Its just a transfer of your wealth to others.

One solution to this reprehensible, unnecessary scheme is to demand that Congress meet its duty to coin our money and regulate its value.  This new species of money would be printed by the Treasury Department and spent directly into the economy according to the budget Congress and the President agreed on for necessary goods, services, and the rest of the things governments are supposed to do for the citizenry.  This new money, also declared as Legal Tender, would bypass the Fed and would be DEBT FREE.  There would be nothing to pay back because nothing would have been borrowed in the first place and there would be no accumulating interest. This is exactly what President Lincoln’s Greenbacks were.  A few details would need to be worked out but this would by no means be impossible to achieve.  Other countries have done it recently and successfully.

The set-up we have today, with the the Fed bankers gradually and surreptitiously manipulating themselves into the middle of everything and raking in a cut for the bankers and others at the top at the citizen’s expense, is unconstitutional and accepting this is just as much a demonstration of lunacy as driving on an emergency trip from Duluth to Minneapolis by way of Fairbanks, Alaska.

The Federal Reserve Banking system, as it operates today, is not just unnecessary to the citizens of the United States, but it is an enslaving plague that must be eliminated.  And that is why I am asking our U. S. Senate and House hopefuls, Klobuchar, Bills, Cravaack and Nolan to now openly and specifically pledge that if elected, they will act on behalf of the citizens of our country to diligently work to eliminate the Federal Reserve Bank.

And if you are one of the thousands that read my blog, feel free to bring this one to the attention of the four hopeful candidates listed above.

Ken Kollodge

The Rule Book

The Rule Book:

As I write this, my Vikings have a 4 wins and 1 loss record and even though it’s a little early to get excited about the Super Bowl, I kinda am a little.

Let’s dream and imagine the Vikings are matched up against the Patriots in the next Super Bowl.  We all know that a team has four downs to get 10 yards in order to keep possession of the ball and that a field goal is worth 3 points and a touchdown is worth 6 points.

But here’s two plays refs might have to make calls on.  What penalty does a “roughing the passer” flag result in?  Or, what if a pass receiver catches the ball while resting on top of the defender who is already on the ground with one foot out-of-bounds?   Then the receiver gets up by touching the ground only with his hand and runs into the end zone.  Does this second play result in a touchdown or is it a completed pass that can’t be advanced or is the pass catcher considered out-of-bounds by extension through the defender’s body who is already on the ground with one foot out-of-bounds and therefore it is an incomplete pass?  Some may know the answers about these two plays right off,  but I’d feel safer looking it up in the rule book.

So, getting back to the Vikings in the next Super Bowl, what if just before the coin toss, the head official called the coaching staffs, captains and quarterbacks from each team out to the middle of the field and did the following?  He pulled out his own “rule book” and ripped out page 11, the other side of which was page 12, then tore out pages 33 and 34?  What if he then announced that the  rules of this game would be based on what was left in his rule book.  Well, that would be absurd!  Of course, the game would not just be chaos with one fist-fight argument after another, the game would be destroyed.

It shouldn’t take long for it to become evident to most fans that the game doesn’t exist independent of the rule book, the rule book IS the game.  Without that rule book, there is no game.  Something might happen on the field, but it wouldn’t be a football game.

There is another “rule book” that is immeasurably more important than the football rule book.  I’m referring to the U.S. Constitution which I think is the most important document ever written.

Our Constitution was written over 200 years ago and has been amended 27 times.  The first 10 amendments are grouped together in a block known as our “Bill of Rights.”  Our Constitution is the rule book for our society and without it our beloved America will slip into chaos.  Regrettably, I think I see indications that we are slipping in the wrong direction in too many areas already but maybe it’s not too late.

To begin with, it is essential to understand that our Constitution may need to be amended again in the future.  But it is also essential to understand that the amendment process does not include just ignoring parts of the Constitution or pretending some passage indicates something contrary to the plain language used nor does it include acquiescing when members of either the Legislative, Executive or Judicial branches of government exceed their authority or shirk their responsibilities as delineated in the Constitution.  Furthermore, the methods of amending the Constitution are spelled out precisely right in Article V of the Constitution itself.

We, as citizens, have allowed our country to develop some bad habits by disregarding our Constitution.  So, in addition to recommending that all citizens read the Constitution (it’s less than 7500 words long including the 27 amendments) I think it is important to know that every time someone from the U. S. Congress (House or Senate) starts a new term, they participate, as a group, in a “swearing-in” ceremony during which they swear and solemnly pledge that they will support this Constitution.  This pledge is mandated in Article VI, paragraph (3) of our Constitution and the current oath goes as follows:

“I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion; and that I will well and faithfully discharge the duties of the office on which I am about to enter”.

This oath is not ambiguous and getting sworn in is not a perfunctory recitation done while texting your buddies about meeting for a beer afterwards.

At this time, I wish to remind our congressional hopefuls: Klobuchar, Bills, Cravaack and Nolan that after the election, two of them will be taking the oath to support and defend our constitution.  As well, in upcoming entries on this blog, I will be asking all four of them to declare that if elected, they will vigorously work to ameliorate a specific pestilence that is wrecking our nation and whose very existence is contradictory to our Constitution and has shamefully resulted in the enslavement of the populace by a handful of people for almost a hundred years.  Its time this problem gets fixed!  Stay tuned.

Ken Kollodge

Mitt

Heaven forbid if Mitt gets in.  I too wish Obama wouldn’t have had to contend with the obstructionist conservatives who apparently joined in lock-step in order to accomplish what Mitch McConnell articulated publicly  (approximate quote) “Our first priority is to make Obama a one term president.”

Did he mean that was more important than the debt crisis, orchestrated foreclosure mess, wall street’s destruction of our economy, the enslavement of us all by the Federal Reserve Banking system,  American corporations sitting on 2-3 trillion dollars in cash and yet creating almost no private sector jobs, most cities and states operating in the red and  property taxes hitting high water marks?  Wow, Mitch, that shows superlative leadership and an outstanding sense of patriotism and love for one’s country and fellow countrymen who are struggling behind the 8 ball.  Really, that’s your first priority??!!

Gee whiz, I long for some of the truly great Republicans to make the choice at least somewhat difficult.  Where are the Lincoln’s, the Teddy Roosevelt’s?   Eisenhower wasn’t all that bad.  I wish Bob Dole was in it and even Barry Goldwater looks pretty good against Mitt.

Ken Kollodge

Cutting The Military Budget Could Lead To War?

A news article June 13, 2012 revealed that General Martin Dempsey, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff and Leon Panetta, Secretary of Defense, testified before a congressional committee saying that cutting our military budget could cause the U.S. to “lose global standing” because our adversaries might recognize we were no longer “unquestionably powerful” and that would “increase the likelihood of conflict” and “invite aggression abroad.”  Put another way, if our military spending is reduced, we might no longer be as feared as the school-yard bully that, based on our past, is likely to attack others without provocation or at least engineer the assassination of heads of state or the destabilization of foreign governments.  Now isn’t that a scary thought if we’d lose that edge?

In my lifetime, my country has been involved in major wars in Korea, Vietnam, twice in Iraq and a war that still continues in Afghanistan.  In none of these instances was war “declared” by congress as is required by our constitution but they were all started by us.  Acting as “commander in chief” our president simply sent our military into battle and there wasn’t sufficient awareness or resistance or counsel demanding that we wait for constitutional authority to do so.

Even though designated as “commander in chief” in our constitution, that title by no means gives or was ever meant to give our president authority to just start wars without there being imminent threats to the survival of our nation or an outright attack on us.  And even then, it would only be on an emergency basis until congress could vote to declare war.  First read Article I, Section 8, paragraph 11, then read Article II, Section II, Paragraph 1 of our constitution for yourself.

And in case the lack of such authority for our president to start wars is not striking enough, see  Article II, Section I, Paragraph 8 that contains the presidential “oath of office” including the statement that the president swears to “preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States.”  What’s obscure or confusing about that?

In case some are still on the fence, how about the 5th Commandment: Thou Shalt Not Kill?  Or the fifth amendment in the Bill of Rights in our own constitution which ensures that a person may not be “deprived of life, liberty or property without due process of law.”  Are these just fanciful or advisory or antiquated ideas or are they what we say we are trying to encourage other nations to implement?  Did the relentless “carpet bombing” in Vietnam that burned people alive with napalm (basically jellied gasoline) or the collapsing of dozens of large buildings with people still inside during the 48 hour continuous “Shock and Awe” starting the last Iraq fiasco constitute “due process?”  Please tell me, what am I missing?

In the last 70 years, is there another country that has started more major wars than the U.S?  What possible explanation can we as a nation concoct for starting wars against “adversaries” that never fired a shot on our soil and couldn’t possibly reach us because these adversaries had neither an air force nor a navy nor missiles that could come within a thousand miles of us?  These wars resulted in the killing of hundreds of thousands or maybe millions of people, including our own, and maiming ten times as many.  Though comparatively of less significance, one can’t ignore the trillions of dollars we squandered in these follies on top of that disregard for human life and the rule of law.

Yet, we have megalomaniacal self-serving clowns like Panetta and Denpsey in top decision making positions yammering to congress that if some of the hundreds of billions of dollars annually going to military contractors are withheld (and maybe spent for, say, education, fixing our bridges, highways, railroads etc.) our country will lose its edge in dispensing fear around the world.

What’s the matter with us?  Can we find our way again before its too late?  Have we all been dumbed down to the point that we can’t think and can’t figure out what’s right or wrong?  As a nation, have we lost our sense about what’s valuable and what’s not?  Can we do no better than fritter away three to four hours a day learning nothing more essential on Facebook then that our friend just decided to line up at the drive thru to get a double cheeseburger?  Couldn’t we use that time for something instructive like learning what’s going on in our own country, what’s dragging us down and what changes are necessary for us to survive?

I can’t help but remember the situation at the end of the movie “Falling Down” when Michael Douglas’s beleaguered character faces off with the retiring cop, played by Robert Duvall, and Douglas finally starts to come to realize the cause of all his problems and he says with incredulity, “You mean it’s me?”

Only infrequently do you ever hear any discussions about our so called “nation building” thru military force and intimidation.  We are told that there are many who hate us.  And why would that be?  Do you suppose that maybe it’s because we’re there and because we put military bases on their soil?  What would we do if China landed forces and started building a military air strip just outside Lincoln, Nebraska?  Wouldn’t we spring into action and viciously employ every means available to destroy and expel them?  And in doing so, would we be terrorists or patriotic freedom fighters?

Wouldn’t there be a security benefit to us if our weapons manufacturing corporations were not allowed to sell the state-of-the-art weapons systems they create to other countries?  Or would that hinder free trade and the mythical “free enterprise” system?  Well, ok, maybe. And wow, wouldn’t that be just awful?

So, as we search for possible reasons causing that well-founded haunting suspicion Panetta and Dempsey tried to instruct congress about, that others are “out to get us,” is it time to ask, “You mean it’s us?”

Ken Kollodge